r4XEM
Your data is everywhere.
Your decisions shouldn't be.
Your teams operate in separate systems โ€” supply chain in one tool, finance in another, pricing in spreadsheets.
โœ•
๐Ÿ“ฆ
Supply Chain
$8K/day
Blocked. No signal
โœ•
๐Ÿ’ฐ
Finance
Q1 miss
Too late to react.
โœ•
๐Ÿท๏ธ
Pricing
Stale
Spreadsheet-driven
โœ•
๐Ÿช
Store ops
28 stockouts
Zero visibility
r4XEM
The solution
Enterprise Intelligence,
Unified.
XEM COMMAND connects supply chain, finance, pricing, and store ops into a single AI-powered command center.
๐Ÿ“ฆ
Supply Chain
๐Ÿ’ฐ
Finance
๐Ÿท๏ธ
Pricing
๐Ÿช
Store Ops
XEM COMMAND
AI-powered enterprise intelligence
Live
What you get
Move Faster.
Decide Smarter.
XEM COMMAND transforms fragmented data into clear, actionable decisions.
3ร—
Faster Decisions
From issue identification to approved action in one platform.
$18M+
Value per Portfolio
Continuously scans for missed revenue, excess cost, and risk.
0
Surprises at Month End
AI monitors every project in real time.
Portfolio
Optimization Report
Simulation Lab
Approve
Execute
โ† Portfolio | | โ‘  Report โ†’ โ‘ก Simulate โ†’ โ‘ข Approve โ†’ โ‘ฃ Execute
Portfolio Command
Capital allocation engine ยท 5 opportunities identified
Rank by
Total Upside
$24.3M
Across 5 opportunities
Confidence-Weighted
$18.7M
Risk-adjusted expected value
Executable <90 Days
$9.2M
3 of 5 within execution window
Avg. Payback
6.4 mo
Weighted by capital deployed
Portfolio AllocationConfidence-weighted value distribution
Inventory $7.8M Sullivan $6.3M Loyalty $5.4M Pricing +3.2% Supplier $4.5M
Opportunities
Sorted by ROI
Inventory Reallocation#1 ROI
+$7.8M
Cost Savings ยท NE Region ยท 184 Stores
โฌฅ 84% ConfidenceSupply Chain5 mo payback
Reduce excess inventory by 18% via demand-signal reallocation.
Sullivan County Inventory#1 Confidence
+$6.3M
Revenue Recovery ยท 47 Stores ยท 6 Districts
โฌฅ 91% ConfidenceSupply Chain4 mo payback
Right-size stock using demand signal rebalancing across districts.
Increasing Customer Loyalty#1 Simplest
+$5.4M
LTV Growth ยท 62,500 Customers ยท 3 Segments
โฌฅ 88% ConfidenceCRM8 mo payback
Segment, protect, and grow high-value customers through behavioral targeting.
Supplier Consolidationโ‹ฎ
+$4.5M
Cost Reduction ยท Tier 1 & 2 Suppliers
โฌฅ High ConfidenceOps7 mo payback
Reduce costs by streamlining supplier relationships.
Pricing Adjustmentโ‹ฎ
+3.2%
Revenue Increase ยท 12 Key SKUs
โฌฅ Moderate ConfidenceSales10 mo payback
Optimize pricing based on elasticity model and competitor data.
+
Model New OpportunityAI-powered scenario builder
Projected Revenue Impact
Base Case
Optimized
$60M$40M$20M$0M202520262027202820292030
Recent Insights
โš  Risk: Supplier Delay
Tier 1 suppliers at risk of 3โ€“5 week delays affecting Q2 fulfillment.
โœ“ AI Recommendation
Increase pricing on 5 SKUs based on elasticity model.
โฌฅ Cost Saving Opportunity
Logistics optimization
+$2.1M
๐Ÿ“Š
Select an opportunity to view its report
Choose an opportunity from the Portfolio.
Optimization Report
Inventory Reallocation โ€” Northeast Region ยท 184 Stores
Total Impact
+$7.8M
โ†‘ Cost savings identified
Confidence
84%
High โ€” validated against 3 yrs data
Complexity
Medium
Time to Value
65 hrs
~3 distribution cycles
๐Ÿ“ฆ
Problem Identified
Excess Stock (NE Region)$3.2M over target
Stockout Incidents (last 30d)14 events
Carrying Cost Waste$8K/day
Inventory Days vs. Target18d vs. 12d target
โœ“
Proposed Solution
Reallocation Shift+8% to NE high-demand stores
Margin Recovery+$2.4M (+0.8 pts)
Service Level Uplift+0.8 pts โ†’ 97.2%
ReversibilityModerate โ€” 48hr rollback
๐Ÿค– AI Analysis & Key Drivers
Root Cause: Static allocation logic hasn't been updated since Q3 2024.
Demand Signal: NE metro stores show 22% higher velocity on 38 SKUs vs. suburban.
Risk Factor: Aggressive reallocation (>12%) could create suburban stockouts.
Benchmark: Similar Midwest reallocations delivered 91% of projected value.
Optimization Report
Increasing Customer Loyalty โ€” Behavioral Segment Targeting
Total LTV Growth
+$5.4M
โ†‘ Across 3 segments
Confidence
88%
High โ€” validated via A/B holdout
Complexity
Low
Time to Value
8 wks
Q2 2026 campaign cycle
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Problem Identified
Current Churn Rate18% annualized
At-Risk High-Value Customers1,700 (12% of top tier)
Campaign ROI (current)2.1ร— (below 3ร— target)
โœ“
Proposed Solution
Churn Reduction-4 pts โ†’ 14%
Campaign ROI Uplift3.4ร— (from 2.1ร—)
Win-back Recovery+31% retention in at-risk
๐Ÿค– AI Analysis & Key Drivers
Root Cause: Batch-style campaigns treat all customers identically. Top 18% generate 54% of revenue.
Churn Signal: AI detects churn 60โ€“90 days ahead with 81% accuracy.
Growth Lever: 41% of mid-tier show pre-graduation behavior. Personalized nudges can accelerate 15,800 customers.
Optimization Report
Sullivan County Inventory โ€” Demand Signal Rebalancing ยท 47 Stores
Revenue Impact
+$6.3M
โ†‘ Revenue recovery
Confidence
91%
Very high โ€” strong demand signal
Complexity
Low
Time to Value
4 wks
4 distribution cycles
๐Ÿ“ฆ
Problem Identified
Excess Stock$2.1M across 31 SKUs
Stockout-Risk SKUs18 within 7-day window
Fill Rate93.1% vs. 97% target
โœ“
Proposed Solution
Revenue Recovery+$6.3M projected
Fill Rate Uplift+4.3 pts โ†’ 97.4%
Transfer Efficiency94% (AI-optimized routing)
๐Ÿค– AI Analysis
Root Cause: Single allocation profile for 6 distinct demand districts. Rural vs. urban variance exceeds 40%.
Routing: Current inter-store routes at 71% capacity. AI-optimized achieves 94% with zero added cost.
๐Ÿ”ฌ
Select an opportunity to simulate
Choose an opportunity from the Portfolio first.
Simulation Lab
Inventory Reallocation โ€” Northeast Region
Projected Margin: +$2.4M|Confidence: 84%|Reversibility: Moderate
Confidence & Risk Meter
Allocation Shift (%)+8% Northeast
-10%+15%
Inventory Days Threshold12 days
8 days20 days
Service Level Target97%
95.0%99.5%
Baseline
Conservative
Aggressive
Margin Performance
BaselineProposedHigh
BaselineProposedโ—‡ Delta
Margin$12.1M$14.5M+$2.4M
Confidence91%84%-7%
Service Level96.4%97.2%+0.8 pts
Simulation Lab
Increasing Customer Loyalty โ€” Segment Targeting
LTV Growth: +$1.2M|Churn: -4 pts|Confidence: 88%
Segment & Campaign Parameters
Protect Segment Budget55%
20%80%
AI Personalization LevelAI-Driven
BatchPredictive AI
Win-back IntensityMedium
LowHigh
Retention-First
Balanced
Expansion-First
LTV & Retention Forecast
Q1Q3Q4
BaselineProjectedโ—‡ Delta
LTV Growth$4.2M$5.4M+$1.2M
Churn Rate18%14%-4 pts
Campaign ROI2.1ร—3.4ร—+1.3ร—
Simulation Lab
Sullivan County Inventory โ€” Demand Signal Rebalancing
Revenue: +$6.3M|Confidence: 91%|47 Stores
Excess Stock
$2.1M
31 overstocked SKUs
Stockout-Risk
18
Within 7-day window
Transfer Efficiency
94%
AI-optimized routing
Rebalancing Parameters
Rebalance Intensity+11% Target
+5%+20%
Demand Signal Lag3-day
1 day7 days
Safety Stock Buffer10 days
5 days18 days
Baseline
Balanced
Aggressive
Revenue & Fill Rate Forecast
BaselineProposedโ—‡ Delta
Revenue$18.4M$24.7M+$6.3M
Fill Rate93.1%97.4%+4.3 pts
โœ…
No opportunity selected
Run a simulation first.
Inventory Reallocation โ€” Approval
Impact: +$2.1M|Confidence: 85%|Complexity: Medium
โœ“
Impact Confirmation
I understand the expected financial impact (+$2.1M recovery).
I acknowledge the risk range (ยฑ$2.3M) and moderate reversibility.
I have reviewed the optimization report and simulation results.
i
Execution Scope
Systems: Supply Chain OMS
Regions: Northeast (184 Stores)
Effective Time: Next Distribution Cycle (4:00 AM ET)
Reversibility: 48-hour rollback window
โ†ป
Risk & Reversibility
โœ“Reversibility Score: 0.74 (Moderate)
โœ“Operational Complexity: Medium
โœ“Downstream Dependencies: Low
Customer Loyalty โ€” Approval
LTV Growth: +$5.4M|Churn: -22%|Confidence: 88%
โ—ˆ
Segment Overview
๐Ÿ›ก Protect
14,200
High-value ยท Top 18%
LTV$4,820
Churn Risk12%
๐ŸŒฑ Grow
38,500
Mid-tier ยท Upsell ready
LTV$1,640
Upsell Ready41%
โš  At-Risk
9,800
Declining engagement
App Drop-38%
Churn68%/90d
โ†ป
Risk & Reversibility
โœ“Reversibility Score: 0.94 (High)
โœ“Complexity: Low
โœ“Dependencies: None
Sullivan County โ€” Approval
Revenue: +$6.3M|Confidence: 91%|Complexity: Low
โœ“
Impact Confirmation
Revenue recovery and fill rate improvement confirmed.
Transfer logistics risk range of ยฑ$1.4M acknowledged.
Report and simulation reviewed.
โ†ป
Risk & Reversibility
โœ“Reversibility: 0.88 (High)
โœ“Complexity: Lowโ€“Medium
โœ“Route Conflicts: None detected
๐Ÿš€
Approve an opportunity first
Complete the approval step to build your execution plan and assemble the team.
๐Ÿš€
Inventory Reallocation โ€” Execution Plan
Approved by James Carter ยท Northeast Region ยท 184 Stores
Live Execution
Target Impact
+$7.8M
Cost savings
Team Members
4
Across 3 departments
Tasks
6
2 in progress ยท 4 upcoming
Go-Live
Mar 3
Next dist. cycle
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Execution Team
MR
M. Rodriguez
VP Supply Chain
Supply Chain ยท Executive Sponsor
Lead
KP
K. Patel
Distribution Coordinator
Supply Chain ยท NE Region
Assigned
AW
A. Washington
Regional Ops Manager
Operations ยท NE Region
Assigned
LC
L. Chen
Finance Controller
Finance ยท Cost Center
Pending
๐Ÿ“‹
Execution Tasks
โœ“
Configure OMS allocation rules โ€” Update allocation logic to +8% NE shift
K. Patel
Done
2
Validate warehouse capacity โ€” Confirm Boston DC can absorb increased volume
A. Washington
In Progress
3
Notify store managers โ€” Brief NE region store managers on new stock levels
A. Washington
Mar 1
4
Finance sign-off โ€” Approve carrying cost impact for Q1 close
L. Chen
Mar 2
5
Execute distribution cycle โ€” Run reallocation at 4:00 AM ET
K. Patel
Mar 3
6
Post-execution review โ€” 48hr service level + stockout check
M. Rodriguez
Mar 5
๐Ÿ“…
Timeline
Done (1)In Progress (1)Upcoming (4) ยท Go-live Mar 3
๐Ÿš€
Customer Loyalty โ€” Execution Plan
Approved by James Carter ยท 62,500 Customers ยท 3 Segments
Campaign Active
LTV Growth
+$5.4M
Across 3 segments
Team Members
5
Across 4 departments
Tasks
7
1 done ยท 2 in progress ยท 4 upcoming
Campaign Launch
Mar 10
8-week cycle
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Execution Team
SJ
S. Johnson
CRM Platform Owner
CRM ยท System Lead
Lead
RK
R. Kim
Campaign Manager
Marketing ยท Automation
Assigned
DM
D. Martinez
CS Team Lead
Customer Success
Assigned
NP
N. Patel
Data & Analytics Lead
Analytics ยท Segment Models
Assigned
TG
T. Garcia
Marketing Director
Marketing ยท Executive Sponsor
Pending
๐Ÿ“‹
Execution Tasks
โœ“
Deploy segment models to CRM โ€” Protect / Grow / At-Risk scoring live
N. Patel
Done
2
Build campaign flows โ€” Configure email, push, and in-app journeys per segment
R. Kim
In Progress
3
Configure CS proactive alerts โ€” Set up churn-risk triggers in CS dashboard
D. Martinez
In Progress
4
Creative review & approval โ€” Marketing director sign-off on campaign assets
T. Garcia
Mar 5
5
A/B holdout group setup โ€” Configure 5% control group for measurement
N. Patel
Mar 7
6
Campaign launch โ€” Go-live across all 3 segments and 4 channels
R. Kim
Mar 10
7
Week 2 performance check โ€” Review open rates, churn signals, CS escalations
S. Johnson
Mar 24
๐Ÿ“…
Timeline
Done (1)In Progress (2)Upcoming (4) ยท Launch Mar 10
๐Ÿš€
Sullivan County โ€” Execution Plan
Approved by James Carter ยท 47 Stores ยท 6 Districts
Live Execution
Revenue Target
+$6.3M
Recovery projected
Team Members
5
Across 3 departments + districts
Tasks
7
1 done ยท 1 in progress ยท 5 upcoming
Go-Live
Mar 3
Mon dist. cycle
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Execution Team
MR
M. Rodriguez
VP Supply Chain
Supply Chain ยท Executive Sponsor
Lead
BT
B. Thompson
Warehouse Ops Lead
Warehouse Mgmt ยท Sullivan
Assigned
JL
J. Lee
Logistics Coordinator
Supply Chain ยท Transfer Routes
Assigned
HN
H. Nguyen
Supply Chain Analyst
Analytics ยท Demand Signals
Assigned
LC
L. Chen
Finance Controller
Finance ยท Cost Center
Pending
+ 6 District Managers โ€” Auto-notified via OMS. Each receives district-specific rebalancing instructions and SKU transfer manifests.
๐Ÿ“‹
Execution Tasks
โœ“
Generate AI transfer manifests โ€” SKU-level instructions for all 47 stores
H. Nguyen
Done
2
Validate transfer routes โ€” Confirm 94% efficiency routes with logistics
J. Lee
In Progress
3
Prep warehouse staging areas โ€” Allocate dock capacity for transfers
B. Thompson
Feb 28
4
District manager briefings โ€” Push store-level instructions to 6 DMs
M. Rodriguez
Mar 1
5
Finance carrying cost sign-off โ€” Approve inventory movement for Q1 close
L. Chen
Mar 2
6
Execute rebalancing cycle โ€” Run transfers at 4:00 AM ET Mon
J. Lee
Mar 3
7
72hr post-execution review โ€” Fill rate, stockout, and revenue signal check
M. Rodriguez
Mar 6
๐Ÿ“…
Timeline
Done (1)In Progress (1)Upcoming (5) ยท Go-live Mar 3
Actions
Items requiring your review โ€” 12 open actions across 4 projects
โš 
3
Overdue
โ†‘
4
Escalated
โ—ท
5
Scheduled
โ—Ž
12
Total Open
In ProgressInventory Reallocation โ€” NE184 Stores
2 Overdue1 Escalated2 Scheduled
โš  Overdue3 days
Approve inventory transfer โ€” 22 SKUs NJ โ†’ Boston DC
4,200 units blocked pending sign-off.
๐Ÿ’ฐ +$340K๐Ÿ‘ค J. Carter
โš  Overdue1 day
Confirm replenishment โ€” 8 stockout-risk SKUs
๐Ÿ’ฐ Prevents $120K loss
โ†‘ EscalatedM. Rodriguez
Review allocation exception โ€” 3 stores above safety stock
๐Ÿ’ฐ $22K/wk carrying
โ—ท ScheduledFeb 24
Authorize next distribution cycle
โ—ท ScheduledMar 3
Mid-point performance review sign-off
โš  UnderInventory Allocation โ€” SE97 Stores
1 Overdue2 Escalated
โš  Overdue
Approve emergency rollback โ€” 31 stores
๐Ÿ’ฐ $14K/day lost
โ†‘ Escalated
Stop project or pivot to revised strategy
โ†‘ Escalated
Approve $0.2M write-down for Q1 close
โœ“ DoneDynamic Pricing โ€” 12 SKUs
2 Scheduled
โ—ท Scheduled
Approve next-wave repricing โ€” 14 SKUs
โ—ท Scheduled
Sign off on Q1 pricing performance report
โœ“ DoneSupplier Consolidation โ€” Tier 1 & 2
1 Escalated1 Scheduled
โ†‘ Escalated
Approve APAC expansion
โ—ท Scheduled
Renew contracts with 4 consolidated suppliers
Project Reports
Total Value Deployed
$18.4M
โ†‘ +12% vs. plan
Actual vs. Projected ROI
107%
3 of 4 on track
Avg. Service Level
97.1%
โ†‘ +0.9 pts
Active / Done
1 / 3
1 underperforming
In Progress
In ProgressInventory Reallocation โ€” NEFeb 3, 2026 ยท 184 Stores
Financial
Margin Recovery
Proj $2.1M$1.4M67%
Operational
Service Level
97%96.8%-0.2 pts
Completed
โœ“ DoneSupplier Consolidation+$4.9M delivered
Financial
Cost Savings
$4.5M$4.9M+9%
Operational
On-Time
96%97.4%+1.4 pts
โš  UnderInventory Allocation โ€” SEBelow targets
โš  Lower sales in 31 of 97 stores.
Financial
Margin
$1.8M$0.6M-67%
Operational
Service Level
97%94.2%-2.8 pts
โ–ถ
r4
r4 Assistant
โ— Online
Model New Opportunity
Configure your scenario and upload supporting data
1 Impact Area
Which part of the business does this opportunity affect most?
2 Primary KPI
What outcome matters most for this initiative?
3 Estimated Scope
How broadly should XEM model this scenario?
4 Time Horizon
When do you need to see results?
5 Upload Supporting Data
Upload relevant datasets so r4 can model the opportunity. The AI will analyze your data against enterprise benchmarks and historical patterns.
๐Ÿ“
Drop files here or click to browse
Upload CSVs, spreadsheets, or reports for analysis
Supported: .csv, .xlsx, .xls, .pdf โ€” Max 25MB per file
๐Ÿค–
r4 will automatically: Detect data structure, identify key fields, cross-reference with enterprise data, and generate an optimization report with confidence scores and projected impact.
๐Ÿ”„
Modeling Your Opportunity...
r4 is analyzing your inputs against enterprise data, historical patterns, and market benchmarks.
Analyzing data structure... 0%
โณ Analyzing data structure
โณ Cross-referencing enterprise data
โณ Running optimization models
โณ Generating confidence scores
โณ Building optimization report